A Tutor's Guide to SAT Claims Questions [Illustrate, Support, Weaken]

Your Guide to SAT Claims Questions (Illustrate, Support & Weaken)

The "Detective Work" of the Digital SAT

You're getting comfortable with the Digital SAT Reading passages. But then you hit one of the three types of Claims questions—Illustrate, Support, or Weaken—and it feels different. It can be confusing because these questions often require you to evaluate new, external information from the answer choices against a claim made *in* the passage. I know this can be a point of frustration. Many students I've worked with initially struggle because they keep looking for the answer inside the passage, but for Support and Weaken questions, that's not where it is.

The best way to think about this is like you are a detective. The passage gives you the central case theory (the claim). The answer choices then provide four potential pieces of new evidence or witness statements. Your job is to determine which new piece of information best illustrates, strengthens, or contradicts the original case theory. For parents, understanding this analogy helps show why these questions test critical reasoning, a vital skill for college, rather than simple memorization.

This skill requires a specific approach. It’s not just about reading comprehension; it's about logical analysis. So, let's put on our detective hats and learn how to systematically break down these SAT claims questions.

Your 6-Step Method for Every Claims Question

Here’s a clear, reliable method you can use for any of these three question types. I want you to have a process you can trust every single time, so you aren't just relying on intuition.

1. Identify the Question Type: The first step is to know what you're being asked to do. Is it asking you to Illustrate, Support, or Weaken? This tells you what your goal is.
2. Pinpoint the Claim: Go back to the passage and find the specific assertion, hypothesis, argument, or description that the question is about. I recommend underlining it or highlighting it in your head.
3. Analyze the Claim: Break the claim down into its core components. What exactly is being stated? A good detective always understands the theory before looking at the evidence. What is the cause and effect? What is being compared?
4. Anticipate the Answer: For Support or Weaken questions, take a moment to think—what *kind* of new finding would make this claim more or less likely to be true? You don't need to guess the exact answer, just the shape of it.
5. Evaluate the Choices Critically: Now, read each answer choice as a separate piece of new information. Ask yourself: "Does this new finding logically connect back to the claim in the way the question asks?" Eliminate any options that are irrelevant or have the opposite effect.
6. Select the Best Fit: Choose the option that provides the most direct and logical illustration, support, or contradiction for the claim from the passage.

This structured approach is a key part of improving your sat reading command of evidence, a skill that the SAT tests heavily.

The Three Types of Claims Questions

Support Questions

Your Goal: Find a new piece of information in the choices that makes the passage's claim more likely to be true.

Your Job: Act like a prosecutor finding evidence that proves the case.

Weaken Questions

Your Goal: Find a new piece of information in the choices that makes the passage's claim less likely to be true.

Your Job: Act like a defense attorney finding evidence that casts doubt on the case.

Illustrate Questions

Your Goal: Find the best example or instance of the claim in action.

Your Job: Act like a journalist finding a specific story that demonstrates a broader trend.

Claims Question Practice Workout

Now let's apply this method. For each of the following examples, we will walk through the process step by step.

Part 1: "Support the Claim" Questions

For these questions, your job is to find the new fact in the answer choices that would make an outside observer more likely to believe the claim from the passage.

Support Example 1: Andromeda Galaxy

The Andromeda galaxy exhibits a complex structure with a central bulge and surrounding stellar halo. Based on simulations analyzing photometric data (brightness, color) and metallicity (chemical makeup) of approximately 300,000 stars in the halo (using data from terrestrial and space-based observatories), astronomers Mei Lin and Carlos Ruiz claim that Andromeda's stellar halo primarily formed through a major merger event early in its history, rather than gradual accretion over time.

Which finding, if true, would most directly support Lin and Ruiz's claim?

1. The chemical makeup of stars in Andromeda's central bulge is significantly different from that of stars in the halo.
2. Most stars in Andromeda's halo are gravitationally bound together in a single, large, coherent stream with uniform velocity.
3. Astronomers have identified dozens of smaller, dwarf galaxies in the vicinity of Andromeda that have not yet been absorbed.
4. Later observations showed that the brightness of many stars in the halo fluctuates on a predictable cycle.

Analysis:

1. Identify Type: The question asks us to "support" the claim.
2. Pinpoint Claim: The claim is that Andromeda's halo formed from *one major merger*, not gradual accretion (many small mergers over time).
3. Analyze Claim: A single big event would likely leave behind a large, organized group of stars from the merged galaxy, all moving together. Gradual accretion would create a more chaotic, mixed halo with stars from many different sources moving in different directions.
4. Anticipate: I would expect a finding that shows a large group of stars in the halo are similar and moving as one unit.
5. Evaluate Choices:
   • A is about the bulge vs. the halo, which doesn't directly address how the halo itself was formed.
   • B directly matches our anticipation. A single, large, coherent stream of stars all moving together strongly suggests they came from one large object in a single merger event.
   • C is about other galaxies *not yet* absorbed, which doesn't provide evidence about the past event that formed the halo.
   • D discusses brightness fluctuations, a detail about the stars that doesn't relate to their origin story (merger vs. accretion).
6. Select Best Fit: Choice (B) provides the most direct support for the "single major merger" theory. Correct Answer: B

Part 2: "Weaken the Claim" Questions

For Weaken questions, you're looking for the new fact in the choices that casts the most doubt on the passage's claim. You are finding a problem or a contradiction in the logic.

Weaken Example 1: Plant Communication

Many plant species release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when damaged by insects. A common hypothesis suggests this is a defense mechanism; the VOCs attract predatory insects that then consume the herbivores causing the damage. Biologist Maria Garcia claims that for wild tomato plants, the release of the specific VOC (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate is specifically intended to attract Macrolophus pygmaeus, a predatory insect that is the tomato plant's most effective defender against spider mites.

Which finding, if true, would most directly weaken Garcia's claim?

1. Macrolophus pygmaeus is also attracted to several other VOCs released by different plant species in the same region.
2. Wild tomato plants continue to release (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate for several hours after the initial damage from spider mites has stopped.
3. In controlled lab environments, Macrolophus pygmaeus preys on spider mites but ignores other herbivores also found on tomato plants.
4. (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate is also strongly repellent to ladybugs, which are known to be another effective predator of spider mites.

Analysis:

1. Identify Type: The question asks us to "weaken" the claim.
2. Pinpoint Claim: The claim is that the VOC release is *specifically intended* to attract one particular defender (M. pygmaeus).
3. Analyze Claim: The core of this claim is specificity and intent. The plant is supposedly "targeting" its best defender.
4. Anticipate: What would weaken this? Evidence that the VOC *isn't* specifically for this one insect, or that it might have a different primary purpose. Another possibility is that the VOC release has a major negative consequence that makes it a poor "intended" defense mechanism.
5. Evaluate Choices:
   • A suggests M. pygmaeus isn't special, but it doesn't weaken the idea that the tomato plant releases the VOC *for* it. The insect could just have broad tastes.
   • B is an interesting detail but doesn't weaken the purpose of the initial release.
   • C strengthens a part of the context (that M. pygmaeus is a good defender against spider mites) but doesn't affect the claim about the VOC's specific purpose.
   • D directly weakens the claim. If the VOC *also* repels *another* effective defender, it's hard to argue the release is an "intended" and specific strategy. It would be a flawed defense mechanism that harms as much as it helps, casting doubt on the idea of specific intent.
6. Select Best Fit: Choice (D) presents a major contradiction to the idea of a targeted, beneficial defense strategy. Correct Answer: D

Logic Flow: How Support/Weaken Questions Work

1. Passage Gives a Claim ↓ 2. Question Asks: Support or Weaken? ↓ 3. Answer Choices Provide NEW Information Choice A Choice B Choice C Choice D ↝ 4. YOUR JOB: Which new fact best affects the original claim?

Part 3: "Illustrate the Claim" Questions

For these, you are looking for a specific, concrete example of the claim. The claim is often a general statement, and the correct answer will be a specific instance that fits the general rule.

Illustrate Example 1: Economic Principle

In economics, the principle of "inelastic demand" describes a situation where the quantity of a good or service demanded by consumers does not change significantly when its price changes. This phenomenon typically occurs with goods that are considered necessities, have few substitutes, or represent a very small portion of a consumer's budget.

Which of the following situations best illustrates the principle of inelastic demand?

1. After a coffee shop doubles the price of its luxury muffins, sales of the muffins decrease by 75%.
2. A city increases the price of public bus fares by 5%, but daily ridership remains almost exactly the same.
3. When a popular brand of athletic shoes goes on sale, the number of units sold triples in one week.
4. Two competing supermarkets lower their prices on bananas, leading to a large increase in banana sales across both stores.

Analysis:

1. Identify Type: The question asks us to "illustrate" a principle.
2. Pinpoint Claim: The principle is "inelastic demand," where demand does not change much when the price changes.
3. Analyze Claim: We need a scenario where a price goes up or down, but the number of people buying the product stays stable.
4. Anticipate: I'll look for an example of a price change with little to no change in sales/demand.
5. Evaluate Choices:
   • A shows a large price change causing a huge change in demand (very elastic). This is the opposite of the principle.
   • B shows a price change (a 5% increase) causing almost no change in demand ("ridership remains almost exactly the same"). This is a perfect example of inelastic demand. Public transport is often a necessity with few substitutes.
   • C shows a price change causing a massive change in demand (elastic).
   • D also shows a price change leading to a large change in sales (elastic).
6. Select Best Fit: Choice (B) is the textbook definition of inelastic demand in action. Correct Answer: B

Why Your Hard Work on Claims Questions Might Not Be Paying Off

If you're reading this and thinking, "I understand the logic now, but I still get these wrong on practice tests," I want you to know you are not alone. It's an incredibly common point of frustration. And as I've told so many students over the past 12 years, it is not your fault. You are likely using ineffective study materials.

The system is broken. Major test prep companies often sell what I call "BS material"—question banks that don't reflect the true nuance and logical complexity of the Digital SAT. The official prep from the Bluebook app is good, but it has a very limited number of questions. Once you've done them, your practice stops. You can't build skill without extensive, realistic practice. You are putting in the hours, but your time is being wasted. This is the very reason I built The Test Advantage: to give students a fair chance with unlimited access to hyper-realistic practice.

The Test Advantage: The Right Tool for the Job

Understanding the methods in this guide is the first step. Turning that understanding into a higher score requires targeted practice on high-quality materials. Here's how The Test Advantage helps you improve on SAT claims questions.

• The Antidote to "Fake" Tests: With over 40 hyper-realistic, full-length Digital SAT tests, you will encounter hundreds of claims questions in every possible context—science, history, literature. You will not run out of material. This is the volume of practice needed to build true skill.
• AI-Powered Weakness Detection: Our platform's AI goes beyond a simple score report. It analyzes your performance to find your exact skill gaps. It will tell you if you are specifically struggling with "Weaken" questions versus "Support" questions, allowing you to focus your valuable study time.
• The "Why" You Never Get: Getting a question wrong is a learning opportunity, but only if you understand your mistake. We provide clear video explanations for every English question on the recent Digital SATs. We don't just give you the right letter; we explain the logic so you can apply it to the next question.
• Targeted Skill-Building: Once the AI finds your weak spot, you can use our bank of 5000+ targeted skill questions to drill that specific question type until it becomes second nature.

Your Next Step to a Higher Score

You now have a clear, logical framework for approaching some of the toughest questions on the Digital SAT Reading and Writing section. The "detective" work of claims questions is a skill you can build. It requires a good method and the right kind of practice.

Don't leave your college ambitions to chance by using ineffective materials. Give yourself the advantage of a system designed for one purpose: to raise your score. I invite you to see the difference for yourself.

Start Your 7-Day Risk-Free Trial Today

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Are "claims" on the SAT always scientific hypotheses?

That's an excellent question. While they are very common in science passages (e.g., a claim about why a planet has a certain feature), they can appear anywhere. A claim in a history passage might be an author's interpretation of an event. A claim in a literature passage could be a critic's argument about a character's motivation. The key is that a claim is an assertion that can be supported, weakened, or illustrated.

2. How is a "Support the Claim" question different from a question that asks for evidence from the text?

This is a critical distinction. A question asking for evidence *from the text* requires you to find a direct quote inside the passage that proves a point. A "Support the Claim" question, however, presents a claim from the passage and asks you to pick a new, *external* piece of information from the answer choices that makes the original claim more believable. The evidence is in the choices, not the text.

3. What should I do if I don't fully understand the science or history in the passage's claim?

You are not expected to be an expert in the topic. The SAT is testing your reasoning ability, not your prior knowledge. Focus on the structure of the claim itself. You can often replace the complicated terms with simpler placeholders. For example, a claim like "Organism X thrives due to chemical Y" can be thought of as "This thing survives because of this other thing." Then, you can evaluate the logic of the answer choices without needing to be a biologist.

4. Why does it seem like these claims questions are more common on the Digital SAT?

This is a great observation. The Digital SAT has shifted to using many short passages. This format is perfect for presenting a single, focused claim and then asking you to evaluate it. It's a very efficient way for the test makers to assess your critical thinking and logical reasoning skills, which are highly valued in college courses. So yes, mastering these is more important than ever.

5. My child seems to understand the passage, but they still get these questions wrong. What does that mean for our prep?

This is a very common scenario for parents to see, and it means the issue isn't reading comprehension but logical analysis. Your child understands the "what" of the passage but struggles with evaluating the "how" or "why" in the answer choices. This is where generic prep often fails. The solution is practice focused on logical connections. Our platform is ideal for this because our explanations break down the *logic* of why an answer supports or weakens a claim, a skill that can be taught and learned with the right tools.

---

Which of the three claims question types—Illustrate, Support, or Weaken—do you find the most challenging? Let me know in the comments below!